(This post has been brought to you by the efforts of my 35 glorious and delightful Patrons! Visit my Patreon page to learn how to become one of them.)
I don’t normally talk about being dominant, because generally my experiences in that area are so rare as to be virtually non-existent. In fact, if you’d asked me ten years ago, I probably would have told you I wasn’t dominant at all–pure submissive, that’s me. But my Goddess and I have found out that I have a dominant streak that’s (as She so wonderfully put it) “an inch wide and a mile deep.” I’ve recently gotten some better ideas about what triggers it–there have been some very, um, welcoming people on Tumblr–and I thought I’d share my ideas here.
First, I’ve figured out that my dominance is part of my submission. I’ve always known I have a service kink, where I get off on doing things for other people and making them happy. (That last part is important, by the way. One of the few really negative kink experiences I had was when someone was telling me to do stuff, but getting constantly irritated with me.) I’ve also known for a long time that I have what Goddess calls an “enablement kink”; when I’m in scene, whatever is turning the other person on turns me on too. (For a while, this caused a little worry for Goddess; She’d seen me submit to other Dommes, and was worried that I had fetishes She wouldn’t be able to fulfill. I had to explain to Her that I wasn’t really into them either, I was into the other person being into them.) So while I’m still not sure if I’m actually “dominant”, my kinks for service and enablement lead me to get off on the energy of a submissive in scene when it’s clear that they really want to submit to me.
Second, this means that consent is really, really, super important to me in an ongoing way. Which, I mean, really it should be for anyone into D/s play, because consent is really the only thing that makes it D/s play as opposed to assault and rape, but I really need clear and enthusiastic consent or it messes me up. Because some part of me really views this as a sort of performative submission, giving the other person what they want even if what they want is to submit to me, so if they don’t make it clear that they’re into it, I pull back. Which leads to…
Third, I will go as far as they want to go. Because I’m feeding off of their energy and their cues, I do kind of let people top from the bottom. I don’t necessarily give up control, but I have an easier time with their limits than I do my own, simply because I have very few limits in scene. This is a little worrying to me, because I’m afraid I will push someone else’s limits simply because they will need to assert them actively, but I think as long as I’m clear with people about that up front it’ll be okay. (Which is a nice thing about hypno-play, you can just do that. Goddess actually instilled a hypnotic compulsion in me to safeword if my subconscious needs to.)
Fourth, I really do enjoy it. I used the phrase “performative submission” up above, but it really feels like a kind of role-play. I feel like I’m writing out an erotic story real time with another person, and I get the same charge out of it that I do out of writing erotica. It’s not at all the same energy that I get from actually submitting–that’s a kind of soothing, peaceful energy of just going along and being whatever Goddess wants me to be. But it has a power of its own.
It is a little strange, getting switchy after a lifetime of pushing back against a stereotype of “dominant men, submissive women” in D/s play in general and hypnokink in particular. (About which more next time, maybe.) But I don’t think I’m changing so much as exploring a side of my submission that doesn’t get talked about much. And maybe it should. Maybe everyone who’s dominant would be better at what they do if they realized that being dominant is actually just a way of submitting to a submissive.